Entries Tagged as ''

Hubbard Street Dance Company (Three to Max, Too Beaucoup)

Last Sunday, I went to the Hubbard Street Dance Company for the first time. It was actually my first visit to any professional dance company ever. I still have a lot to learn about dance.

As an amateur aficionado, these are my thoughts.

Three to Max (Ohad Naharin)
While not my cup of tea just yet, this was undoubtedly interesting. The shapes and the movements of the dancers are arresting. The piece experiments with patterns quite often—with an especially notable section that involved demonic-techno counting (I’m guessing that this was counting because the words were not in English). With each number, the dancers assumed a different pose, but the counting did not rise in regular succession. Sometimes it would repeat 1-2-3, 1-2-3-4, 1-2-3-4, 1-2-3-4-5… These hitches really made me pay attention and even anticipate what the next move on the next number was going to be.

Naharin would have each section or idea be on stage for just the right amount of time for me to understand the visual. Then he would change things up so that the lengthy piece (over 50 minutes?) did not feel long at all. Even during the particularly fast sections, I didn’t feel like I was missing something. For example, near the end, he has three lines of dancers rotating into the spotlight for solos. Even though there were always three solos going on at the same time, they performed long enough for me to think I’ve caught all of them but short enough where I felt like I had to prepare and concentrate for the next trio so I don’t end up missing anything. Very clever.

Hubbard Street Dance Too BeaucoupToo Beaucoup (Sharon Eyal)
I find out after I left the theater that Eyal is the protegee of Naharin. This makes a lot of sense now, but it did not serve her well during the performance. First, the quirkiness of the dancers’ movements was reminiscent of the same in the first piece. I thought that this was just how the Company had decided to put together the program, but since Too Beaucoup came second, and was not as visually interesting as Three to Max, I got bored after a while. It felt like echoes.

Second, the fact that I thought an entire company of dancers in full-length body stockings, glow-in-the-dark contact lenses, and freaky powdered wigs were boring is saying a lot about the choreography. Unlike Three to Max, Too Beaucoup relied on the same formations for far too long.

Patterns were also in play here, but with the visual tricks created by the costuming on the darkened stage, they were harder to pick up. And since they went on (in my opinion) for too long, I just was not as invested in looking for them. Strangely enough, a lot of the patterns were very asymmetrical. I couldn’t figure out the reason for this, and that left me unhappy as well.

Overall, there was not enough change within this piece to keep me engaged beyond the novelty in the first portion of it. The pacing, the ideas, the shapes, etc. all could have used more variety. It felt like a music video that would have been cool as a Michael Jackson-length video but when it went past that time, the rest just didn’t hold up.

I tell you what though, those dancers sure were workin’. I worried for them.

Book: Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman

Neverwhere is not a great book. Neil Gaiman‘s language sometimes fails him. I also had a few issues with the speed of the story and the amount (either too many or too few) of details as the story went through.

But… Gaiman’s strength lies in his ability to construct mythologies out of nothing. These are mythologies that feel as if they have always been. When I read Gaiman, I have a hard time remembering that his ideas are not ones that I have always known. That rat-speakers are not tradition in the same way that fairies are.

And it is for this, that you should seek out Neverwhere. And the much better Sandman series.

There are almost too many literary influences to reference. Campbell’s hero’s quest is obvious, as is the structure of Dante’s Inferno. Alice in Wonderland comes to mind. And also Doctor Who. And don’t forget about The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy series.

Richard Mayhew is an every man living in London. On a particularly stressful night, he chooses to help a girl in need rather than secure his own future prosperity and happiness. That decision reveals to him the existence of London Below, a city that is every bit as real as his London Above.

There is a reason that Chicago has this as its current One Book, One Chicago selection. Just like London, Chicago has an underground rail system. It also has its share of the lost, homeless, and crazy. The book wonders, what do these people know? Where do they go? Is there a world that serves them when our world refuses to even see their existence?

Mythologies are stories that serve to shape world views. Neverwhere is a modern story for urban times that, nevertheless, feels as old as it should.

Movie: Winter’s Bone

Winter’s Bone is a chillingly atmospheric movie. The threat of violence and the desperation of poverty is everywhere and continuous.

Ree is the movie’s main character, a 17-year-old girl whose father has gone missing. It turns out that after an arrest for cooking meth, he had put his house and land up for bond. Unless he shows for his court date, Ree, her mentally-incapacitated mother, and her two much younger siblings are out in the woods.

Ree sets out from her place of strength, a poor but loving home, into a wild and sinister community set in the rural American mountains somewhere. At each homestead, she asks after her father and the creepy and guarded interactions practically scream conspiracy.

Being an outsider though, I didn’t know what to think for a long, long time.

Winter’s Bone is a different kind of detective mystery. It invokes Veronica Mars for me, but unlike Veronica Mars, where the teenage sleuth faces a closed-off conspiracy of wealth in the blaring California sun, Winters Bone‘s teenage heroine must negotiate the dark backwoods equivalent.

It is a detective story. It is a hero’s quest. It is a story about family and strength. And all of it could have gone very, very wrong. The characters could have become stereotypical, the hero overly melodramatic. But it didn’t. I suppose that’s why I don’t make films. Because I have no idea how they saved it all and actually made this good.

If I Picked the Oscars 2011 (in order of my vote)

Best Picture:

Best Actress: