Entries Tagged as 'What I Learned'

WILT: The People are the Sovereign Power of the United States

Yesterday, I learned that James Madison, a Virginian, spearheaded the idea of a strong central government that superseded state governments.

Today, I learned that the Federalists got around this contentious idea by having the people be the source of ultimate sovereignty. Any government is merely the agent of the moment, and no government can be fully representational of the people.

The people hold the final power. The national and state governments are always subservient to the sovereign entity that is the citizenry.

It’s a pretty amazing idea, and one that we’ve kind of lost sight of these days. We’ve grown accustomed to having Washington be in charge.

I’m going to think about this for a bit.

WILT: A Virginian Killed State Sovereignty

To be fair, what I learned today is something I probably already learned a long time ago, but it’s one of those things that doesn’t mean anything until you know enough of the story.

Today, I learned that James Madison was a Nationalist (according to Gordon S. Wood). Madison was the primary author of The Virginia Plan, which took the United States away from being a confederation and into being a country with a strong central government. In fact, in this proposal to the Constitutional Convention, he wanted the national Congress to be able to overturn and rule invalid state legislative acts in much the same way that the courts do.

If you’re not a history fan, this may not mean anything much. Now that I know much more than I used to though, this floored me. Madison was so close with Thomas Jefferson and founded the Democratic Party with him. They opposed the Federalists and their nationalist agenda by touting personal liberty, local rule, and state sovereignty.

Of course, I always forget that he is one of the writers of the Federalist Papers because it’s too easy to lump him in with the Virginians. When learning history, it’s customary to teach opposites: Federalists and Jeffersonians, North and South, Nationalists and States’ Rightists. Plus… Virginia went on to make such a stink about states’ rights closer to the Civil War.

Now I know better. Many in the South actually wanted a stronger central government than what was provided by the Articles of Confederation and many in the mid-Atlantic states (plus New Jersey, which proposed the “opposition” plan to Madison’s at the Constitutional Convention) wanted to keep local rule.

Regionalism as a prism for looking at US history has it’s place, but I have obviously made it be too harsh a filter if I have forgotten so much about James Madison.

By the way, I’m almost done with this book, and it is a really good one. A full write-up will come later.

WILT: Lincoln Didn’t Campaign for the Presidency. We May Never Know the Meaning of Life

The things you learn by reading…

These blew my mind today.

From Lincoln President-Elect: Abraham Lincoln and the Great Secession Winter 1860-1861: It was considered unseemly to campaign for yourself during Lincoln’s days. Others could campaign for you but if it seemed like you wanted to be President too badly, the people didn’t vote for you. So in the crucial months before the Southern states left, Lincoln didn’t even make speeches, travel, and campaign very much at all. There was a cone of silence for everyone.

Come to think of it, can we reinstate this practice?

From The Making of a Philosopher: In talking about the mind/body problem (essentially that our minds, thoughts, and consciousness do not match up exactly to the physicality of our brains), Colin McGinn suggests that the connection may be beyond our ability to figure it out. It is beyond our perceptions, our reality. It is beyond our mental capability because that is constrained to our actualities.

There are certain ideas for which we simply cannot think to its actual truth. Wow.

Of course I know that there are issues for which it seems like there is no final answer, but I never really considered that certain close-to-truth explanations may be impossibilities.

And here, it seems, regardless of our delusions of grander, is the real difference between God and Man.